|
|
|
|
|
|
by CodeWriter23
1340 days ago
|
|
|
Your assessment relies on two assumptions. The first being that samples from the “public sequences” are identical to the sequences China’s labs purposefully unpublished early in the pandemic. The second being the assumption there was no nefarious purpose to the well-documented gain of function research taking place in Wuhan. I don’t need to be a biologist to call your assumptions out as junk science. |
|
|