What would you call non-virologists writing virology papers, releasing them as non-reviewed preprints with a huge PR push and then weeks later quietly admitting that their science was bad and none of their conclusions held up?
What if they’d done that multiple times?
“Bias” isn’t relevant when it comes to calling out bad actors.
What if they’d done that multiple times?
“Bias” isn’t relevant when it comes to calling out bad actors.