|
|
|
|
|
by Ecio78
1341 days ago
|
|
It's true also for companies where CIOs are going to Gartner events and don't want to appear like the only ones not being "cloud-only" or "cloud-first" Then you end up with BS like the ones described here
https://www.the-investing-desk.com/cloud-costs-are-in-a-bubb...
where to justify the fact that cloud is much more expensive managers start to throw random numbers vaguely justified just to show that cloud is actually better. I saw similar things in Corporate world even when choosing a colo/service partner vs doing in-house... managers asking us detailed costs for infra needed (servers, network, licenses etc.) and when you were getting something like 30 in-house vs 100 hosted they just threw some random FTE count to support it to get to 110 vs 100. |
|