|
|
|
|
|
by the_other
1336 days ago
|
|
One could fight terrorism by dropping nukes on all the places terrorists live or work. But that would have bad consequences beyond the intended effect. It's possible to be for some strategy or aim, but against an individual tactic which could fulfil that aim. This tactic (pervasive surveillance) has significant, proven fallout. It also has a history of fuelling long-term pervasive discontent that ultimately lead to the collapse of regimes which used it. It should not be on the table. |
|