|
|
|
|
|
by BreakfastB0b
1331 days ago
|
|
This PBS Space Time video does a good job of explaining it https://youtu.be/1Z5fnwUmTSY. tl;dr the inner and outer event horizons of spinning black hole cancel out leaving a naked (ring) singularity which is believed to be prevented by the “Cosmic Censorship Hypothesis”. In the math it causes the event horizon radius to become complex which is believed to be “unphysical”. However maybe not, many “unphysical” mathematical objects have later turned out to be real such as black holes themselves (Einstein thought they were just a mathematical artefact) and anti matter (a result of negative roots of the Dirac Equation). Complex numbers are also an intrinsic part of the way Quantum Mechanics works, so perhaps there are naked singularities. |
|
I thought matrix mechanics was with real numbers and was mathematically equivalent. I also thought there were different statistical systems that included “negative” probabilities that can be used to describe wave packets without needing complex numbers.
I do agree that sometimes the maths leads you to a truth in reality. Though sometimes it doesn’t.
I’m not too familiar with QFT, does that require complex numbers?