|
|
|
|
|
by archi42
1341 days ago
|
|
The difference is in the amount of cache you need. In one case you save 10GB per 1MB of cache, in the other just 1GB per 1MB and the big file is going to evict many small files (even if the user only listens to the first 10s).
It's no huge difference for a single user/site, but across all users this quickly means needing a multiple of the current cache; which doesn't come for free. Also, CF have a product to sell. The free tier is just the demo version: I think at the end of the day the policy is about not everyone in HN using CF for their low-cost DIY video and/or music streaming or download platform. And I can totally see them reverse the decision and sponsor that project (it's probably something a support engineer has no power to decide). |
|
Okay, now run the same thought experiment with 10,000 downloads of a 1MB MP3 v. 10,000 downloads of a 1MB HTML/CSS/JS site. What difference then?