|
|
|
|
|
by bmacho
1340 days ago
|
|
> And actually.. since a vector space has an underlying set, it seems to me that to do a direct sum on a vector space, you must first do a direct sum on the set (that is, do a disjoint union), and then do other things to map the rest of the structure of a vector space into the sum. No. > So, somehow, a disjoint union (of the underlying set) becomes a cartesian product (of the whole vector space)? No. If anything it is the other way: the cartesian product of the underlying sets becomes the (equivalent of) "disjoint union" of the vector spaces. > (Is there somewhere to read about this to gain intuition?) I don't think you want that. But there definitely are some category theory textbooks, and introductory pdfs. E.g. Tom Leinster Basic Category Theory is a textbook, and it aims to give you intuition. https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.09375 |
|