"Fix it live" or "Fix it in production" is basically JIRA's entire MO.
I get that move fast and break things is supposed to, in the end, ensure better code, better debugging and ultimately a better experience.
But the way JIRA does it (And a few other companies) is, quite frankly, painful to see, even on the sidelines.
Like that time they just straight locked folks out of their tenants if their tenant name started with number or something. They do thing, often without any aux plans to revert. Its pants on head crazy imho. How key executives listed in their stock portfolio pages didnt lose their jobs over that is beyond me.
I get that move fast and break things is supposed to, in the end, ensure better code, better debugging and ultimately a better experience.
But the way JIRA does it (And a few other companies) is, quite frankly, painful to see, even on the sidelines.
Like that time they just straight locked folks out of their tenants if their tenant name started with number or something. They do thing, often without any aux plans to revert. Its pants on head crazy imho. How key executives listed in their stock portfolio pages didnt lose their jobs over that is beyond me.
https://www.protocol.com/bulletins/atlassian-jira-outage-wee...
https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/technology/ongoing-atl...