It is easy to talk for someone who has not
experienced the fallout of an nuclear
powerplant burning a few countries over.
First, I am very sorry. That must have been unimaginably scary.While it it not the same as experiencing this terror firsthand, my grandparents lived not very far away from you during the Chernobyl incident. It was very frightening. Also, I live not so far away from Three Mile Island here in the USA. As well as very several currently functioning nuclear plants. So while it is "easy" for me to talk about nuclear power, it is not purely fantasy for me. If you produce one kW/h of nuclear energy today
my opinion is that the costs of the potential
fallout in the weird rare cataatrophe scenario
and the waste storage for the whole lifetime of
the waste need to be paid ahead. That, however
would make nuclear uneconmical.
I mostly agree, but I would also say the same thing about fossil fuels.I am looking at this from the perspective of global warming, which will have disastrous consequences for many billions of people. Should we also add the costs of global warming to each kW/h of energy produced by coal or natural gas? |
Yes. That's what carbon pricing/taxes is all about after all: counting the externalities.
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_price