[jrochkind1]

The IRS does not really agree. Home office expenses got quite a bit stricter a few years ago, and even before that expensing your entire apartment because you worked out of it was probably not technically allowed.

https://money.usnews.com/money/personal-finance/taxes/articl...

However, the IRS has very little staff to audit or enforce, you can probably get away with breaking the rules... until you don't.

[gamblor956]

Note that if someone get caught doing this, the IRS can and will open other additional tax years for examination.

The statute of limitations is currently 3 years from when the return is filed, 6 years if the deficiency (between the reported amount and the tax calculated due by the IRS) is 25% or more and the disparity is unintentional or the result of good faith efforts by the taxpayer to report their liability.

However, if a deficiency is deliberate, there is no statute of limitations on how far back the IRS can go to audit the tax year and assess penalties (and possibly also refer to the DOJ for criminal charges).

[dcow]

The home office thing is a personal deduction that an individual can claim. I'm talking about scenarios more akin to "the founder sleeps in the company office".

[jrochkind1]

Where the "company office" just happens to be a (from GP comment we are all replying to) "fancy SF and NYC apartment" in a residential building?

I mean, I'm not a lawyer or CPA, and I'd advise any HN readers to consult such before deciding on a tax strategy based on HN thread. Because, also, yeah, no.

Honestly, if you are sleeping in an actual office as your primary residence, you probably technically have to include the fair market value as income on your personal taxes, but if you're really on a couch in an office building maybe you can get away with it (until the landlord of the office building kicks you out because it's not zoned for or up to code for residential and thus illegal for them to rent to you for that purpose). If it's a residential apartment... sounds like out and out tax fraud to me. I am not a lawyer and this is not legal or tax advice.

[dcow]

I mean I've actually seen founders living out of work/life spaces. Not the WeWork type. The type where a large commercial or industrial building is converted into a "co-working-living" space. Not a lawyer either so I have no idea if it's legal to the letter of the law, but it exists.

[jrochkind1]

I have never heard of a "co-working-living space", so you know things I don't!

Sounds like a different thing than just trying to deduct 100% of your apartment as a business expense because you don't have an office yet though. Which is what I thought we were talking about from the GP. Like, maybe lots of people are doing that, but maybe lots of people are committing tax fraud, the IRS instructions are not too fuzzy here.

[dcow]

I never said 100%. I am not sure if I put off the wrong vibe by accidentally insinuating that founders are lavishly burning money or something. That’s not my intention. My point is that 50k/yr is not enough to live in SF or NYC. Something is filling the gap.

The logistics aren't really the point. No I don’t know how exactly founders do their taxes. But I do know that when you work 24/7, a lot of things look like business expenses.

[jrochkind1]

My guess would be what's filling the gap is pre-existing savings/family money.

My point is just that the IRS has standards for what you can deduct or treat as a business expense (rather than wages), and it is not "when you work 24/7 a lot of things look like business expenses".

Not paying for your own apartment and instead treating it like a business expense still sounds like tax fraud to me, whether or not the business has it's own office yet.