|
|
|
|
|
by osigurdson
1338 days ago
|
|
Of course, it is hard to say without knowing more about it, but it seems that jiggawatts solution is closer to optimal than the second one. The 50GB database could fit on a USB drive after all and we know empirically that a single SQL server database was able to handle the requests since the old system worked. Also, the fact that a consulting company was able to turn a part time gig for one person into a $100M+ project at the taxpayer's expense is very frustrating. |
|