|
|
|
|
|
by powerslacker
1338 days ago
|
|
Laws are non-material by definition. You can't eat or touch the law of gravity for example. Using "caught up in a religion" or "means something different to every member" as a reason to ignore an argument is arbitrary and an a priori dismissal of potential evidence contrary to your beliefs. In other words, you are ruling out a position simply because you are prejudiced against that position. There are laws which claim to be moral supernatural law which are written down. If these laws are what they claim to be and are truly of supernatural origin then not only do they exist, they exist in a greater capacity than laws written by human hands or instruments. A transcendant law presupposes a transcendant author and arbiter. |
|
What does your transcendent/moral supernatural law say the top marginal tax rate should be?