[webshit2]

First they were "likely" doing it. Now they've "clearly" been doing it. But lo and behold, after fooling stupid normies for decades they're ready to announce their doomsday device to the public because......? Were the coherent ones who could look up patents ready to drop some truth bombs on the public?

[chemtrailz2]

Well up until today I thought it was 'likely', but today given the preponderance of evidence that pointed there the last 15+ years, I now feel OK saying 'clearly'.

You can nitpick and get pedantic on that point if you want - that doesn't change the fact that the 'conspiracy theorists' in this situation were literally pointing out all of the research on "stratospheric aersolozied injections" that indicated the government wanted to do a global experiment to block out the sun, and today they are openly admitting it using the exact same language.

I personally find it incredibly unlikely that they have done 0 research and testing on this prior to this announcement, so I find it reasonable to believe they have clearly done it in some capacity in the past which led to this wider decision. You may not agree, which is fine.

That however does not change the fact that the conspiracy theorists were at least right about the method and mode the government was planning to use to block out the sun -- the only thing you can nitpick about is whether or not it has been done in secret on some scale prior to this announcement.

[dingaling]

I think you would have heard howls of protest from global airlines if they were forced into suboptimal routing as part of some grand experiment.

In fact the trend is opposite, towards technology-enabled free-routing of each individual flight.

[Schroedingersat]

This would be trivial to prove and impossible to hide.

Get a $50 diffraction grating off of ebay and make a spectrometer out of it and you'll have your answer. Compare the results to the different aerosolcandidatesin your patents and white papers. No conspiracy theorising needed.

[webshit2]

Yeah, this is why I can’t take you guys seriously. You take something completely reasonable: researching something that has been publicly proposed for decades and you jumped to loading it with shit like “openly admitting”. Let’s see this preponderance of evidence lol.