[DiabloD3]

Since HN removed public comment scoring, my up vote is not publicly indicative of the quality of this comment.

Thus, I would also like to echo this sentiment that Bitcoin is worth pursuing.

[8plot]

Unfortunately the down-voters of my comment disagree. Until they present their argument against bitcoin, I assume they are only being ignorant.

[saurik]

I did /not/ downvote you (and still haven't), but honestly you may as well be suggesting he look into accepting contributions of ferrel camels on his website: 99.99% of people in the position to give you money at all are going to have bank accounts and cards, and are likely to have no clue how to even obtain bitcoin, much less actually own any; it simply isn't a realistic "option".

[8plot]

You make a fair enough point, the market size of bitcoin users is still very small. However, the technology it provides is real, and IMO, a valid solution to this problem. (even if it's not the only solution; it's not uncommon to accept multiple payment methods.)

Those that want to donate with bitcoin can easily google how to buy it, and will discover it's easier than ever to acquire. (in some cases, using paypal!)

[DiabloD3]

Well, its worth mentioning that Bitcoin cannot do charge backs, cannot freeze your account, and doesn't charge astronomical fees.

I'm not sure why anyone would downvote Bitcoin.

[nknight]

Because it's not a useful option for normal people, and carries its own set of legal ambiguities that vary from place to place.

All these "use bitcoin" responses are as useful as "let them eat cake".

[DiabloD3]

Not at all, bitcoin wants the users to also have the cake while eating it.