[numbsafari]

Except that here in the US a non-trivial number of politicians of a particular persuasion[1] actually believe that government issued ID, of any kind, is the "mark of the beast". There's a reason that Real ID had a lot of push back. Having USPS, already a political bogey-man for that same crowd, become a holder of "identity" is probably going to face a lot of pushback.

[1] just one, recent example... https://www.al.com/news/2022/10/alabama-gop-chairman-made-th...

[hcurtiss]

I can assure you that a lot more constituencies than just the Christian coalittion are concerned about universal government-issued IDs as passports for online participation.

[988747]

I think it's mostly because easily obtainable government ID will make it easy for Black and Latino people to register for vote, which means Republicans will never win any election ever again :)

[collegeburner]

because simple, easy-to-use ID lowers the barrier for demanding ID in more places and attacking anonymity. the easier we make it to demand id, the more people will demand it. wanna use a fake name/not divulge your identity? doing something politically sensitive where you may need some protection? just like your privacy? tough shit show your id or GTFO.

[ivanhoe]

Shouldn't we instead solve the problem that you might "need some protection" because you're doing something political - instead of relying on security-through-obscurity which honestly doesn't even really work anymore, IDs or no IDs. There's so many other ways for governments to track people of interest these days.

[collegeburner]

i disagree with the assumption that it's a solvable problem. people remain fallible and the correct solution is to mitigate our downside by minimizing state power. not disagreeing with the idea that we also need to work on lots of other ways to reduce its power and ability to track people btw.

[billiam]

Pass it anyway. Happy to see them refuse to participate.