|
|
|
|
|
|
by wafflestomp
1345 days ago
|
|
|
The dissent’s argument -
“Were Congress to act today specifically to prohibit the type of racial discrimination suffered by Weber, it would be hard pressed to draft language better tailored to the task than that found in § 703(d) of Title VII:” Is pretty spot on. SCOTUS needs to revisit this issue.
Or congress needs to revise the Civil Rights act to correct the wording cited by the Supreme Court majority on their opinion. Their argument is that the statue states that it’s not “required”, but doesn’t state “required, or allowed”, thus suggesting that congress intended to allow this racial based decisions. And yet Congress included 703(d). Absurd court case which is the source of this ongoing insanity. |
|
|