| 250 litres x 7 metres is 1750 kilogram-force-metres. Wolfram Alpha [0] says this is about 5 Watt-hours, and gives some other handy comparisons: > ≈ 0.45 × metabolic energy of one gram of fat ( ≈ 38000 J ) > ≈ 0.63 × energy released by burning 1 gram of ethanol ( ≈ 27000 J ) > ≈ metabolic energy of one gram of sugar or protein ( ≈ 17000 J ) > ≈ (0.02 to 0.09) × typical kinetic energy of a car at highway speeds ( 200000 to 900000 J ) > ≈ 0.5 × typical battery energy content of an alkaline long-life C battery ( ≈ 9.6 W h ) > ≈ 0.55 × typical battery energy content of a nonrechargeable Lithium-Thionyl Chloride AA battery ( ≈ 8.6 W h ) > ≈ 0.92 × typical battery energy content of a carbon-zinc D battery ( ≈ 5.2 W h ) Gravitational potential energy is just really, really low energy density. Fortunately it's reasonable to have pumped-storage reservoirs that contain trillions of litres of water. [0] https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=1750+kg+metres+in+watt-... |
https://www.epa.gov/red-hill/what-red-hill-bulk-fuel-storage...
They were recently decommissioned due to leaks, but I've often wondered if they could be repurposed as gravity battery storage.
edit: if you want to check my math. I calculated the tanks at ~567 million liters, and am saying there is 120 meters of vertical distance.
They would be equivalent to a 0.1856 GW h (gigawatt hours) battery if repurposed in this way. https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=567810000*120+kg+metres...