Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by watersb 1355 days ago
I think this is a good question, because I had always thought of American Sign Language (ASL) as a transcription of English.

But I learned that ASL is a language all of its own, grammar and syntax are not always the same.

In college, I learned a bit of a sign language- "C Sign" - that is actually an adaptation of English. At the time, C Sign was the thing that hearing, native English speakers were taught as a way to interact with non-hearing ASL signers. That was thirty years ago, so things might well be different now.

I don't have any direct experience, but some of my extended family are native speakers of Apache or Navajo. These are different languages, but "mutually intelligible" - speaking one can be understood if you know the other. And I traveled in Finland and Estonia - mutually intelligible (utterly impossible for me to use either of them).

I think C Sign might be more of a "pidgin": a simplification of English and ESL that is not used natively, but can be used to communicate.

So, yeah -- it's not wrong to wonder if ASL signers are using English, or are able to read it. I believe the answers to these questions are "not really" and "yes, fluently".

(Perhaps the question was posed in a blunt manner. But that's written, online communication for you -- it's an approximation of spoken interaction, and often lacking in body language or tone. So it's often taken in a way that wasn't exactly the intention... :-) Yay, Language!)

1 comments

Ah, yes. My mistake.

Honestly we never spelled it or wrote it down.