|
|
|
|
|
by jstx1
1355 days ago
|
|
A lot of this comes down to personal preferences. As someone who prefers direct language and doesn’t take things personally, I’d rather by asked “why”. I understand that you’re asking for reasons, I can share my reasons without feeling like I’m interrogated. |
|
To take the example from your parent, some sort of problem where you had to choose an algorithm to solve some problem. There are multiple choices that have their pros and cons.
Imagine this in person. The "Mh" comes out finger placed on mouth, thinking and exclaiming an excited "Very interesting!" as he has some realization from thinking about it. Then, with an excited face expression and in a tone that signals he is interested in comparing notes asks the "Why did you choose that algorithm?" question. Totally OK. You now go on to discuss the pros and cons and why you chose that particular algorithm over another one.Now the very same one:
Imagine this either in person or in writing where you've had previous "run-ins" with the other person, so you imagine it like this: The "Mh" comes out scoffing, almost barking. A mischievous "very interesting!" that transports his contempt for your choice. He knew you'd make this totally inadequate choice of algorithm even though better ones exist. Followed by a condescending "Why did you choose that algorithm?". That conversation is dead Jim!The point after all this being that the word why can very easily be interpreted this way, which is harder to do when using these other words in part also because you have to structure the sentence in a less 'violent' way.