|
|
|
|
|
|
by ynbl_
1345 days ago
|
|
|
what absolute outrageous absurdity as usual. america is a fucking cesspool > In a detailed ruling, Judge Stefan Underhill concludes that the service failed to show that it doesn't circumvent YouTube's technological protection measures. this is saudia arabia tier nonsense. why do these anti piracy articles always mention circumventing a "protection"? how can a news outlet echo this and not bat an eye? this makes me think all the people who support this law are frothing pointy haired scum that think everything should just be their way, mixed with idiots who buy into their arguments like "a protection was circumvented!". im not paying tax money to protect your absolute garbage media making $5 more from blocking piracy. you do not have the right to exist, its a privilege if anyone buys your shit (and we know well that lots of idiots are buying pop media regardless of piracy) and what music industry? i didnt think such a thing still exists after 2010 also, youtube is unusable garbage, solely because it forces me to use their non-working in browser viewer instead of real software. |
|
|
I don't know what you're talking about. I use youtube all the time in Firefox with ublock origin and sponsorblock. It's an amazing service.
Free 4k videos with no ads on almost any topic? Sign me up.