Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by MayeulC 1349 days ago
Well, you could capture once over a range of inputs to get a much better initial first guess too!
1 comments

I'd bet that they do some of that, too, but if you've got 100 images you want to get "perfect", it's probably faster to capture 10 of them uncalibrated, guess at the curve, capture those same 10 and 10 more calibrated with guess #1, and make a second guess, for a couple iterations than it is to capture all 100 images before any calibration and then all 100 again afterwards to confim, especially if there's any slop in the calibration curve.