| This Reuters article is disingenuous at best. They're downplaying the harm by changing the context. Re: "found that 18% -- not one third -- experienced any detectable cardiac effect" This research found 1:43 harm - because that harm included detection of damage to the heart via blood: "Troponin blood test - troponin is a protein which is released into the blood stream when the heart muscle is damaged. The troponin level provides a quick and accurate measure of any heart muscle damage. It's used to help in the assessment following suspected heart attack." Troponin was part of the research - and in 1:43 trooponin was detected post-shot vs. pre-shot. And 1:301 is still extremely bad, no? Certainly you can make a judgement on that? It is actually harming 1:43 but even harming a heart - which is permanent damage as the heart doesn't heal - 1:301 of harming a young person's heart is completely unacceptable - especially when they're at very little risk of any significant harm, nowhere near 1:301 from COVID itself. Also, 100% of the teens didn't recover after 14 days: there is permanent heart damage in 1:43. They also focus on only including myocarditis numbers to make their numbers seem less worse (1:301 is still horrific) - by excluding the case(s) of pericarditis from their numbers. Notice how Reuters is at the top of Google, and Reuters has routinely misled people to train them of these shallow-narrow talking points - to give them enough narrative to make them think the alarming research was less true than it actually is. |
And elevated troponin is not definitive of permanent heart damage.
In the context of Kim Jung Gi's death, studies suggest an excess of <5 cases of myocarditis per 100,000 vaccine doses for men aged 40-50: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-31401-5/figures/3
I suspect this is considerably less of a risk to that age bracket than COVID.