[fredestine]

Putin wouldn't attack ukraine for no reason. He is probably one of the most open leader we had in recent years with trump. they both spoke exactly like they acted. Putin always said that ukraine should remain neutral and that if not russia will act with its army. same threats were pushed against finland for instance. Removing an elected president and backing up pro-european rioters definitly destroyed this neutrality. US knew that and prepared for this outcome willingly.

[dale_glass]

You're still answering to something I didn't say. I said precisely what I meant to. Try answering to something I actually said.

[fredestine]

"Putin would have always been able to attack Ukraine. He's not bound to some sort of world government contract. He can do anything in his power as the President of Russia, and that includes attacking Ukraine, even if for stupid or inconsistent reasons."

i was answering this. he is not - unlike the western press tends to say - stupid or incosistent. he is literaly the most consistent leader of his era. we know what he wants and what he protects. he never changed his mind on the key areas of his geopolitic view of the world. not like europe or us presidents do every new election or new mandate to get more voices. Putin always said that ukraine was to remain neutral. and if you play around words then by your logic even biden would be able to press the red button and extinct mankind for stupid or inconsistent reasons.

[dale_glass]

> i was answering this. he is not - unlike the western press tends to say - stupid or incosistent.

Doesn't matter one bit. He's free to change his mind on that at any time. He can't make a promise that's binding on himself, he can always go back on his word and nothing can be done about it.

> and if you play around words then by your logic even biden would be able to press the red button and extinct mankind for stupid or inconsistent reasons.

I'm not playing around with words. That's exactly what I mean. He really can.