|
|
|
|
|
by jelliclesfarm
1360 days ago
|
|
I wasn’t virtue signalling. Over supply of money will make inflation worse, but constriction would bring down spending. A labourer making daily wages and supplemented by govt dollars will spend all of it. A millionaire with a few millions in the bank is not going to spend any of it. Especially during an overheated inflationary period. It’s better spent to the most vulnerable to pay for their food, gas and utilities. This is exactly what needs to be done to keep spending going. It’s spending from a healthy and happy middle class that keeps the economy going. Can’t freeze them out. Not implementing measures like this would collapse the economy. An economy with hopeless disenfranchised hungry poor majority is exactly the first ingredient in the recipe for revolts and revolutions. Also..it’s heartless to not share a surplus to people who are suffering. We are a rich country. No one died because someone else got a little extra money to pay their electricity bill or gas. |
|
By redistributing to poor people, that previously stationary money is now being used to compete for goods, since poor people generally spend all of their money. So more money is now chasing after the same goods, prices have to go up.
It might make people feel good in the short term, but continuing inflation also hurts the poor, and could potentially widen wealth gaps even further since the wealthy are mostly invested in assets which can keep up with inflation, but poor people’s salaries do not keep up very well.
Short term looks like a good move, but it just kicks the can and continues widening the divide of rich and poor