| No he doesnt, you are wrong, just more confident. https://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?artic... A few seconds of googling clearly demonstrates MANY circumstances in which the NATO is encouraged or required to fire warning shots. Seeing as you struggled to discover any information before declaring the other commenter incorrect, let me fetch some for you. [Above source, page 159, Bosnia 2001]
"Further, warning shots were permitted, even encouraged,
and the use of deadly force against assailants fleeing an attack was not
even covered. " [Above source, page 161, footnote 24]
See infra notes 108-16 and accompanying text for a discussion of how current ROE require U.S. troops to use both verbal warning and warning
shots, while the DOJ policy on the use of deadly force does not require the
agency's officers to employ either of these actions. So, while the DOJ has policy which excludes warning shots for US military, they were also ordered that they must use both verbal and warning shots as a part of their rules of engagement. >Calling BS on this story, sorry. No one in this world is training to fire a "warning shot". That is from the movies - full stop I'm sure if I looked harder I can find many, many more examples. Please do at least the faintest whiff of research before declaring someone else incorrect - full stop. |