[wyldfire]

> But you don’t have to join Sourcegraph to be able to party with us. Our code and our development are public

Oh cool - AFAICT, that "our code" link is a link to a demo instance of sourcegraph on sourcegraph's code. This looks like an interesting product.

And it's open source? What's present in the commercial offering that's missing from the open source one? Just support, or features too?

[beyang]

Sourcegraph's licensing is open core (similar to GitLab): https://handbook.sourcegraph.com/departments/engineering/pro....

Our code is public, regardless of whether it is open-source or enterprise licensed. The open source code includes most of the product features; the enterprise code includes things like enterprise AuthN, AuthZ, and admin capabilities that are needed for large companies to use Sourcegraph.

Sourcegraph.com/search indexes over 6 million open-source libraries, nearly every github.com repository with at least 5 stars and the most popular projects across NPM, PyPI, Maven Central, and many more independent projects and code hosts.

[deng]

Isn't the main caveat of the OSS version that you can't use any extensions? Last time I checked, most of the stuff that made Sourcegraph actually interesting for me were extensions, so the OSS version was fairly limited in what it could do.

[Maxious]

Extensions are being deprecated anyway https://about.sourcegraph.com/blog/release/4.0#:~:text=Your%...