Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by pimterry 1361 days ago
Yes, it won't. As parent points out, the EU previously mandated micro-usb support (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_external_power_supply) which worked fairly well, and hasn't stifled the innovation that's resulted in USB-C.
3 comments

> the EU previously mandated micro-usb support

No they didn't, compliance is voluntary, just read the linked wiki page.

I agree with the point that it won't stifle Innovation though. The swift passing of the USB-C mandate has proven to me that the EU can move quickly, so if a new connector comes along they will be able to switch the law reasonably quickly.

If you've followed the EU for a few decades, you'd know they occasionally move quickly, but not often, and the movement is rarely in the best direction.
The multiple previous recommendations on mobile phone charging ports passed relatively quickly too.
Maybe some non Europeans are unaware, but the EU handles several other areas than phone connectors.
The topic at hand is phone connectors -- we have data about how the EU handles them, so why bother using estimates from some other thing?
Technically voluntary, but every major phone manufacturer (including Apple) committed to it and followed it (although in Apple's case, with a dongle).
But, crucially, they were able to effortlessly move to a better connector when one came along. They were not legally forced to stick with Micro-B. Now they are legally stuck with USB-C indefinitely.
This isn’t swift I don’t think, we’ve been hearing about this for years now.
This mandate was conceived in 2018: https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/46756/attachments/2/...

I think 4 years is a reasonable time frame. Especially considering they weren't sitting around doing nothing for 4 years, most of it was research and surveys

> Although compliance is voluntary, a majority of the world's largest mobile phone manufacturers agreed to make their applicable mobile phones compatible with Europe's common external power supply specification (EN 62684:2010).

Is compliance voluntary for this new ruling?

TBF, it was "voluntary" for the old spec too. Everyone agreed to it in writing because otherwise they were told legislation would be swiftly passed.

That's not really voluntary.

According to your link, compliance was voluntary. Its in the second sentence.