Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by agentultra 1347 days ago
I can’t believe I missed that.

I still don’t think the proof part is necessary even with the potential for internal employee tampering. With sufficient system authorization and security auditing catching someone tampering would be enough than wasting all that compute resource to prevent it for such a rare case.

Cool story though. I really like UO back in the day.

1 comments

I 100% agree - I don't think that I would ever reach for a PoW blockchain to solve this problem, but it has certainly generated some interesting discussion