|
|
|
|
|
by New_California
1353 days ago
|
|
It's much more than exchanges and miners as exemplified by the 2017 block size war, won by the users. The scenario you are describing - while possible in principle - is unlikely. Stakeholders understand that scarcity and change-resistance is Bitcoin's very definition. Take that away and there is no value left, Bitcoin becoming another malleable shitcoin. |
|
Was it? Did you get to vote on that? Or was it decided by a handful of pools and large players?
> The scenario you are describing - while possible in principle - is unlikely.
Whether it's likely or not is beside the point. It's possible in theory, therefore (and this is my main point here) the digital scarcity of bitcoin is not some emergent mathematical property of the universe, it's a social phenomenon.
However unlikely, it only takes a critical mass of people to change their minds and it can be changed. The article talks about this property as if it is something akin to a hard universal property or mathematical axiom, but it's not, it's a very human property and very malleable as a result.