|
|
|
|
|
by Spivak
1357 days ago
|
|
> treat certain minorities as if they’re all from single parent homes That’s not what you should have taken from that example at all, which is specifically why I used two white coded names. The point is that people grok individual disadvantages easily and giving them a leg up feels natural, and the same reasoning should be applied to systematic disadvantages. > regardless of whether that’s true for the individual. What you’re describing is looking at privilege through the lense of intersectionality, which nobody disagrees with. |
|
Cough. Intersectionality assumes that people's problems are the problems of their identities, and that their identities are the ones visible to others. Black, short, etc.
Identity politics seems purpose-built by "allies" to explain why the allies don't actually listen to the people they're helping.
For instance, Thomas Sowell isn't treated as an individual who disagrees with BLM's policies instead he's declared to be a defective or traitorous black man who isn't part of the real black people group.