Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Andrew_nenakhov 1360 days ago
Whatever Stallman views are, you can always start a new org and express your views that benefit the Free Software instead of harming them. Thus you we'll naturally outcompete the FSF and improve Free Software competitiveness.

It's not like Free Software is exclusive property of rms and FSF. Many parties can take part in the fight.
1 comments
mort96 1360 days ago
Okay but a major point of the post, whether you agree or not, is that Stallman's views is harming the technical merits of GNU software, making copyleft software less competitive than it should be. That's not going to change just because you start a new organization which tries to evangelize for Free Software in a better way.
link
Andrew_nenakhov 1360 days ago
Well I agree that it is a major point of the post. An no, I don't agree with this major point, in that Stallman's views somehow harm GNU anything. Anyone who believes he can do a better job can try doing a better job. But for some reason most such critics want Stallman do a job according to their expectations. No, it is not how it works.

I also find Stallman's position on a contributor/project head positions imbalance to be perfectly reasonable. Contributor has to convince project head to do something. Project head doesn't need to do that. If a contributor is unhappy, he can fork the project, become the head himself (with all the problems that such position brings), and do a better job.

link
selfhoster11 1360 days ago
Nothing prevents such future FSF successor organisation from forking all GNU projects and setting a different contribution policy or whatever. You won’t be able to change/upgrade the licensing terms unless you get the blessing from FSF itself, but then, Linux seems to be managing fine on GPLv2 so maybe it’s not such a big issue.
link