|
|
|
|
|
by krumbie
1354 days ago
|
|
What's kind of crazy is how the images tend to have similarities in small features that become very apparent when flipping back and forth between images, but which are not obvious per se. For example, I flipped back and forth between Beatrix Potter and Paulus Potter. A rounded white bonnet in one picture becomes a couple of blossoms in the other. The roof of a house becomes some shadowy wall with plants in the other. Two flower pots are very similar, just with slightly different coloring. It makes it more apparent that the algorithm etches the images out of noise, and if the seed is the same for two images with different prompts, you're likely to see traces of that noise represented differently but recognizable in both images. |
|