Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by mbell 5307 days ago
This is really backwards thinking. The regulation of 'Engineer' has not grown to support the concept of the modern world. The laws in Canada were enacted as a result non-qualified people designing bridges and buildings that fell over. At the time almost all 'Engineering' actively had a life safety component, the same is far from true today.

Those fields that still life safety components are of course regulated, primarily through PE licensing but there certain is no reason not to properly use the term 'Engineer' when its due.

For what its worth my degree is in electrical engineering and have never even considered getting a PE license, its not applicable in the fields I work in.

2 comments

My job title is Software Engineer where I work (well that's what it says on my desk), and honestly I find it to be a little silly. Maybe because of what I grew up associating "engineer" with; my father is an engineer / manager for a power plant, which feels like 180 degrees away from what I do. But in the end it's just words, I couldn't care less what you call me as long as I'm being paid to code!
I have a degree in Computer Engineering, but I've never got a PE license either. The important thing is that I don't ever call myself an Engineer. I am a programmer, or developer, or whatever; calling myself an Engineer would be dishonest.

I don't think it's backwards thinking so much as an important distinction between how Canada uses the word "Engineer" and how much of the rest of the (English speaking) world does.

I don't see how calling yourself an 'Engineer' is dishonest, adding 'Professional Engineer' or 'PE' to your title would be dishonest as those terms have regulatory meaning.

'Engineering is the discipline, art, skill and profession of acquiring and applying scientific, mathematical, economic, social, and practical knowledge, in order to design and build structures, machines, devices, systems, materials and processes that safely realize improvements to the lives of people.'

Regardless of the formal designation of 'PE' or other designation many people do fit the term 'Engineer'.

The real issue is that some limited jurisdictions have decided that 'Engineer' must equal 'PE'. That doesn't make the use of the term 'Engineer' improper outside those jurisdictions nor does it make the choice to equate the two concepts universally correct.

Though I understand and largely agree with your argument, the reason why I don't call myself an Engineer is that I know that people may not understand the distinction.

I legally cannot call myself a "Professional Engineer". In order to prevent unintentionally misleading people, I stay as far from the word "Engineer" as possible.

I suppose it's not really dishonest. I depends more on the individual's intentions.