[Dylan16807]

You gave an example of something that wouldn't change and called it a downside. So yes you need to do better than that for examples.

If you're taking a "no free lunch" approach, the downside is that it costs money to hire these people. Does that make the balance clearer?

Adding human review to more decisions, and changing nothing else, can possibly cause some problems but they should be very minor compared to the number of robot-caused problems they will fix.