|
|
|
|
|
by Dylan16807
1357 days ago
|
|
That's an impossible standard. Why are you demanding that? As far as possible standards go, he was very far inside the relevant rule. I don't know why you would interpret "said he didn't need to" as "legally bound themselves to inaction in such a case". |
|
> Abbreviated, censored, or light profanity (like “hell” or “damn”) in the title, thumbnail, or video.
People are just making up rules here.