[mcraiha]

Headline is misleading. And same applies to the text. e.g. 928 vs. 900 difference is around 3% (assuming benchmark scores scale linearly) and 18,453 vs. 16,000 difference is around 15%. At least 15% isn't "runs circles around" kind of situation.

[hotcoffeebear]

> the latter is notorious for underperforming in CPU-Z and one might have to wait for other benchmarks to surface before jumping to conclusions.

Quite a clickbait title