|
|
|
|
|
by gwicks56
1358 days ago
|
|
The problem with that approach is that nobody agrees on what is frivolous. So it ends up being counter-productive as everyone squabbles about why their most hated thing is frivolous and should be banned/regulated, whilst the thing they like provides enough benefits that is should be left alone. Off the top of my head, the things I have seen people argue should be banned due to climate effects:
- Eating meat
- Plane travel
- Cars
- Only large 4WD's ( but not cars)
- Clothes dryers
- Bitcoin
- AI
- Computer games
- Christmas lights
- etc |
|