> other than it's obligatory "written in rust" advantage.
I completely fail to see how implementation language would be an advantage to a static site generator, especially the security advantages that Rust is often recommended for. Memory safety is great if you're exposing a program, but here i'm just exposing the results of the static site generator, and none of Rusts features will be evident there.
The only advantage from my point of view would be site generation speed, which goes for both Go and Rust over Python/Ruby.
I completely fail to see how implementation language would be an advantage to a static site generator, especially the security advantages that Rust is often recommended for. Memory safety is great if you're exposing a program, but here i'm just exposing the results of the static site generator, and none of Rusts features will be evident there.
The only advantage from my point of view would be site generation speed, which goes for both Go and Rust over Python/Ruby.