| > The US will continue to carry a debt load. No, no, that part no contest. How you think the debt load might shrink without the US defaulting. How do you think this will happen? When? Who? Real-world specifics, a plausible scenario that you think might play out. How does the debt get smaller? What is going to change that hasn't been the case since the 70s? And why will the US not just default in preference to of attempting to do the impossible when those conditions change? > This is just a silly statement. I don't think we can have a rational conversation about monetary policy if you think that. Reason it out for me, I'm obviously struggling to understand you. What do you think the difference is between borrowing a large amount, returning a small amount and claiming it isn't a default? Why do we have the word default if that isn't a default? If that is a better option than a default, why don't all the debtors do that instead of defaulting? |
> How you think the debt load might shrink without the US defaulting.
It won't, and it doesn't have to. We pay off a trillion on-time, we borrow another. As long as we make payments as required, no one gives a shit.
> And why will the US not just default...
Because then we stop being able to borrow when we want to, like Argentina.
> What do you think the difference is between borrowing a large amount, returning a small amount and claiming it isn't a default?
We borrow a large amount, and return a small amount lots of times, paying down both some principal and a little interest. Again, just like a mortgage.