|
|
|
|
|
|
by _old_dude_
1353 days ago
|
|
|
It's not as bad as it seems because the language already have constructors.
So instead of having a peculiar case for constructors, you unify constructors and methods by saying that void does not have to be specified. And i do not buy your argument that it will break the grammar, the parser of javac consider constructors as methods. |
|
|