[tomjen3]

If there was a better way, I would take it.

But often people don't react until you can point to somebody and say "because of direct consequences of this policy, this person is no longer alive". It is even better if you can show his family crying.

Personally I would prefer getting them to fix it without getting anybody killed.

But that may be too much to ask.

[Fliko]

Yes you save more people in the short term but the risk for disease transmission jumps up quite a lot. I'm sure that not even the doctors really like the fact of the matter but they have to accept it because they must save lives and not take them away for short term benefit.