|
|
|
|
|
by kibwen
1363 days ago
|
|
I have no particular love for the US government or its foreign policy. At the same time, it is neither "a hint of denial" nor "bias" to reject the above claims as nonsense. There is simply no motive. NATO solidarity is at an all-time high, none of the imaginary economic benefits to the US would be worth jeopardizing that solidarity, especially since the US isn't remotely at any point of desperation. In practice it will achieve nothing (other than an environmental disaster), and even the things people imagine it might be intended to achieve are eye-rollingly petty compared to the US's actual strategic objective right now, which is holding NATO together. |
|
Let's see who benefits from this sabotage.
1. Russia doesn't benefit as it disabled their property and removed an important negotiating tool from their portfolio.
2. Germany doesn't benefit for obvious reasons. Now even if they wanted to, they can't try to get gas from Russia.
3. The US on the other hand benefits both by wrecking Germany's industry and opening up a market for their LNG.
4. Ukraine gets to demand more freebies and weapons from NATO. Benefit.
5. NATO gets to dump their own inventory on Ukraine. Benefit.
6. The US weapons manufacturers get new orders. Lots of benefits.
Take a step back and apply some common sense.