[genezeta]

This is one of those things that pops up every year or two years. Unfortunately, the person writing about the new discovered weird trick almost always fails to precede the article with a big, red, bold "Please don't ever do this".

[svnpenn]

and then someone always follows up with "Please don't ever do this", without explaining WHY you should never do this:

https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Chesterton's_fence

[FrontAid]

The article already explains that thoroughly.

[pmoleri]

Nice article, thanks for sharing it.

[genezeta]

It's has been explained enough times. It's just that looking things up for yourself seems to have gone out of fashion.

[spookthesunset]

That doesn’t help people who stumble upon this when searching for the problem. All the “look it up” response does is make sure the search results are a bunch of content saying “look it up”, which isn’t really that helpful.

[llanowarelves]

That's a classic.

Get my hopes up finding an old forum post asking my question, hoping to find answers. All the answers are "use Google/etc", which is how I got there.

[nkozyra]

It is explained fairly early in the article.

This used to be done quite a lot in the early JS days when scope was kind of thrown out the window (no pun) and you just did whatever dirty thing you needed to in order to make a page work.

[pierrec]

lol, I just searched "problem with referencing named element ids as javascript globals": the first result is the linked article and the second result is, you guessed it, this thread with your comment on top.

[scratcheee]

>the person writing about the new discovered weird trick almost always fails to precede the article with a big, red, bold "Please don't ever do this"

> It's has been explained enough times. It's just that looking things up for yourself seems to have gone out of fashion.

It appears you've countered your own complaint.

[LelouBil]

I discovered that with a couple of friends while in JavaScript class. Every one of us was like "this is actually horrible".