Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by boole1854 1368 days ago
So there are "really bad" opponents at the 1600 level, but is it reasonable to think there are "really bad" opponents at the 2600 level? It's a different world up there.
1 comments

Right, op is making a mistake in thinking that a perfect game against a 1600 is the same as a perfect game against a GM. GMs will intentionally play less perfect moves to head towards complications where they will come out ahead. When I start to bang out 15 moves of theory against a IM/GM they will recognize it and play something I’m not familiar with and just win more quickly.
Those games were against opponents 100-200pts lower rated than Hans, in some cases.
You, a chesscom 1600, played a (or multiple) perfect game against a chesscom 2600 and/or strong IM?

Link?

No. I never said that.