|
|
|
|
|
|
by zipdog
5313 days ago
|
|
|
I suspect legal reasons and the US's sue-happy culture are important factors. A scientific screening test puts the onus on the collection agency, so even 99.9% accuracy still risks a recipient getting infected and suing. Asking someone to sign a legal document about their sex life puts the onus on the donor, if they happen to be lying. |
|
|