[throwawaylinux]

> under Truss we are seeing tax cuts for the rich funded by borrowing

Any reduction in government income is funded by borrowing for a budget that is not in surplus, which seems to be the default state of things these days.

And what's stupid about government reducing income and borrowing in a downturn?

[cool_dude85]

>And what's stupid about government reducing income and borrowing in a downturn?

Government finances are not like your household's, reducing spending is exactly the opposite thing the government should do in a recession.

[wucaworld]

That is not correct.

Spending is the appropriate response when faced with a demand driven recession. This is a supply driven recession and reducing govt demand may not be a bad idea.

[throwawaylinux]

I don't know what that has to do with what I wrote though.

Reducing revenue is also one of those things that conventional wisdom says a government "should do" during a recession, so I'm asking why it was stupid.