[dureuill]

I don't know about Java, but in Python, 99% of the modules I create respect the 1:1 mapping between modules and filesystem.

Same in Rust, the overwhelming majority of modules I create is in the standard filesystem <-> modules mapping. For generated code, I use the special syntax that allows not respecting this mapping, but that's once in a blue moon.

IMO, C++ should have taken the same steps: providing sane, correct and easy defaults, while allowing the flexibility to override them when necessary (with special annotations).

I'm disappointed that a modern C++ feature was designed in the long tradition of having bad defaults instead.