Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by montefischer 1367 days ago
From Schopenhauer's essay, "On reading and books":

> No literary quality can be attained by reading writers who possess it: be it, for example, persuasiveness, imagination, the gift of drawing comparisons, boldness or bitterness, brevity or grace, facility of expression or wit, unexpected contrasts, a laconic manner, naïveté, and the like. But if we are already gifted with these qualities—that is to say, if we possess them potentia—we can call them forth and bring them to consciousness; we can discern to what uses they are to be put; we can be strengthened in our inclination, nay, may have courage, to use them; we can judge by examples the effect of their application and so learn the correct use of them; and it is only after we have accomplished all this that we actu possess these qualities. This is the only way in which reading can form writing, since it teaches us the use to which we can put our own natural gifts; and in order to do this it must be taken for granted that these qualities are in us. Without them we learn nothing from reading but cold, dead mannerisms, and we become mere imitators.

Gutenberg link: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/11945/11945-h/11945-h.htm#li...

2 comments

I dislike this view, for learning to write or anything else. It has an implicit assertion that all human quality is innate, and we only ever learn how to recognize and express it. This means that we can never actually learn anything new, we can only learn new ways to pull from our innate quality, and everything else is just imitation.

It implies we are born with some sort of immutable value locked inside of us, which I disagree with.

"We are born with some sort of immutable value locked inside of us"

I think I agree with it. Most people have a natural intelligence or artistic capability or instinctive talent or natural athleticism that cannot be learned and cannot be taught, but that can be acquired by diligent perseverance in practice and effort.

Naturally strong people often do now realize how strong they are compared to the standard. Naturally smart people often mistakenly assume that everyone else is equally as intelligent and that their intelligence is nothing special.

Our brains tend to normalize our everyday experience so that the extraordinary stands out more against the background of life.

Nothing is impossible for anyone, but some things will be easier or harder for you because of how they fit with your natural inclinations, abilities, or skills.

I read it more like the word 'attain' means to internalize those writing abilities are your own; and reading others will not work to achieve developing such an ability. As such, this advice is about the same as most advice I've seen from great writers - read a lot, but write more.
Did Schopenhauer go on to give any reasons to believe that the things he was claiming there are true?