[JPLeRouzic]

In the original link there is this:

Al-Aly and two other researchers looked at the health records of 250,000 veterans who had been infected once with COVID; 36,000 who had been infected twice, and 2,000 who had been infected three times.

Using a “hazard ratio” — a measure of how often bad things happen to one group compared to another — the researchers found that the risk of heart, brain, kidney and blood complications all increased with each subsequent infection.

If I were a political leader I would be frightened:

What will happen in terms of healthcare costs after 10 years?

[xupybd]

Do many political leaders care more than one election cycle out?

[cheaprentalyeti]

More importantly, what happens when the gatekeeers can't block news items like this interview with the former head of the CDC any more, talking about how the US helped fund the virus and covered up the fact? [0]

The same people who were lying about treatments, and running faudulent scientific studies like the surgisphere studies [1]

[1] Bugs me a lot, because there was no investigation as to why they did it, and no followup examination of other studies that I beleive were also rigged in an only slightly more sophisticated fashion. Noone looked at why they faked the first one, and noone thought to followup on the Recover trial knowing that someone faked the first one.

You can go to a physical copy of the 2017 Physician's Desk Reference at a small town library branch and look up the safe and unsafe dosages for for HCQ, from before the "gatekeepers" started censoring and altering everything Ministry of Truth style, and if you do you'll see that the Recover Trial authors were using unsafe dosages on late-stage patients and pretending that meant something it didn't.

It also bugged me that noone followed up on the other entire drug _class_ Sugisphere "proved" didn't help for Covid: ACE inhibitors. Or how they remained not part of the standard of care even after subsequent studies showed the Surgisphere study on that wasn't just fabricated but dead wrong. [2] (slashdot article on surgisphere trial) [3] (original tctmed paper) [4] Here's a paper I found the last time I did research on the subject to see if it was followed up on, it's from a crazy nutso conspiracy alt-site called "Nature."

So when everyone finds out that a) they made it, b) they lied about it, c) they lied about treatments, d) they lied about the vaccines, and e) damn, these health costs are kinda too high... there's going to be an immense crisis. On top of it, the people we helped fund to make the virus are a couple of allied nasty dictatorships, one of which has killed tens of thousands of civilians in a neighboring country in a shooting war that's going on now that we're still helping to fund because we made ourselves dependent on them for energy.

I'd link that but stopgas seems to be down or I have the wrong link.

[0]: https://disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/former-cdc-di...

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23403754

[2]: https://science.slashdot.org/story/21/08/04/1815220/retracte...

[3]: https://www.tctmd.com/news/retracted-over-fraud-concerns-sur...

[4]: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41421-020-00221-6

[jjeaff]

That article doesn't come anywhere close to confirming that the virus was man made. Redfield just complains that Fauci didn't want to spend resources investigating the lab leak theory. For which there are a myriad of possible reasons.

[GauntletWizard]

Absolutely, the only things that the documents prove are that Faucci was involved in using US funds to pay Chinese universities to perform gain of function research, and that he covered it up.

The most generous interpretation is more than grounds to charge him with treason.