[cycomanic]

> I used 'F' as the total effort needed to make the change, while 'm' represented the size of the organization, and 'a' would represent the speed we wanted to perform the change with. F = m * a. A simple way of illustrating the exponential relationship between these factors.

Am I missing a certain insight or did you mean the linear relationship not exponential?

[wolfram74]

No one uses expontential correctly in colloquial contexts, it gets slapped on any super linear curve, or in this case even a linear equation.

[the_af]

But using exponential to mean a linear equation is all sorts of wrong, even in a colloquial sense.

I would understand a colloquial meaning of "exponential" as "it grows faster than linear". Wrong, but it makes informal sense. But using is as a synonym for linear makes no sense whatsoever.

[colechristensen]

What is your definition of exponential then?

[glass_of_water]

A function f(x) whose growth rate at x is proportional to f(x). So anything where growth rate is proportional to the current value.

[crdrost]

There were a bunch of answers, but this is the one that is the most handy in my toolkit.

Linear growth of A on B: For every new B, k new As emerge, for some k (could be and often is fractional).

Quadratic growth of A on B: A grows approximately linearly with the number of handshakes in B, so that in the above language, for every new B, k × B new As emerge, one k for every existing B that the new B could interact with.

On this basis one would say that the number of bugs is quadratic in the lines of source code. Each line has some small probability of interacting with some distant line in some non-negligible buggy way.

Exponential growth of A on B: A grows approximately linearly with the number of connections between A and B, so that in the above language, for every new B, k × A new As emerge, one k for every A that the new B could interact with.

So for “knowledge increases exponentially,” the precise technical claim is that it increases exponentially with time, and this means (somewhat dubiously for long scales) that in a given period of time, every every fact you know has a constant probability of generating a new fact which you now also know. This holds when you don't know very much about a new scenario but tends to be tempered out rapidly, the phenomenon of “low hanging fruit” etc. A meme similarly has an approximately exponential region where the number of folks exposed to the meme drives further exposure to the meme, but this dries up as the probability of “already shared it!” rises and curtails that “I must share it with friends” impulse.

[no_identd]

>"knowledge increases exponentially"

Personally I suspect that as (slightly) false and that it's actually something like quadratic-hyperbolic growth, which looks awfully similar to exponential growth if you don't zoom in.

[marginalia_nu]

f(x) = 0 is the rarest exponential function of them all.

[crdrost]

It grows in every way, because it grows in no way. Does a dog have the Buddha nature?

[mcphage]

Mu.

[fsckboy]

humans learn words through contextual exposure to them.

exponential has two meanings depending whether you studied and understood what exponentials are in a math class, or did not.

if you did not but you've learned the word through repeated verbal contexts, it means "bigly"

also, in the example given of F=ma, the "a" is characterized as "speed" (per second) which it is not; but rather "acceleration" (per second per second) which is related to speed via an integration over time (seconds), but that's a f(unctional) relationship as is exponentiation, so from context I think people pick up that exponential means something like biglyly

(When I read the Mysticization title I was prepared for a pun on the game Myst, but it didn't show up. Myst and SimCity date from the same period of time, and SimCity is a system dynamics game. I was disappoint.)

[rzzzt]

Exponential: f(x) ~ n^x ("n" is constant, "x" is the exponent)

Parabola: f(x) ~ x^m ("x" is the base, "m" is constant)

[igorkraw]

Your variable goes into exponent position. If X is your variable, a^x is exponential, x^a is a-tic

[kittiepryde]

y=x^a would be an example of an exponential equation;

I guess applied to the metaphor, F=a^m

[orbital223]

f(x) = x^a is a polynomial of degree a.

f(x) = a^x would be an exponential function.

[kittiepryde]

You are right. Thanks for correcting me.

[bsilvereagle]

I suspect F was fixed and the curves were showing how m/a varied in that case, in a similar fashion to these plots for momentum: https://frdmtoplay.com/on-a-researchers-momentum/